Friday, December 16, 2011

Passing the Buck

Film review: Eight Men Out
Directed by: John Sayles
(1988)

Pure and simple, this film is great fun. It feels light on its feet, shuffling swiftly from World Series day games, to a behind-the-scenes build up of the sloppily conceived scandal, and back to the ballpark. And it always seems to travel in pairs. The entire cast just dances along together, and the joy is infectious. Dealing out their lines with either a knowing smirk or a nervous twitch, the audience can feel the game is rigged. At first, this casual film seems small-fry on the surface, but Sayles manages to sneak in several clever and subtle motifs to enhance the legendary story of the 1919 Black Sox scandal to the level of epic tragedy - or comedy, depending on how you respond to it.

A pair of small-potato, potential World Series fixers (played with screwball charm by Christopher Lloyd and Richard Edson), are seen in the stands speculating on which of the White Sox starters might be susceptible to their scheme. Later, they approach a money man - Abe Attell - who runs rackets for the big cheese in Chi-town - Arnold Rothstein - with their idea to fix the Fall Classic. Attell can dig it, but when he presents it to the boss, Rothstein says no. Attell decides to finance the small-timers anyway while taking a huge cut for himself.

First baseman Chick Gandil also conceives of fixing the Series while meeting with Boston's own heavy better - Sport Sullivan (who ironically gets the go-ahead from Rothstein himself) - and rationalizes that everybody will be a winner if they fix it together, so he'll gladly get the boys on board. Sullivan is surprised to hear how easy it'll be to convince seven players from the best team in the world to flop for a simple chunk of change. "You never played for Charles Comiskey," Gandil says with disgust.

His partner on the diamond, shortstop Swede Risberg, seems especially comfortable with the idea of a conspiracy. However, the top two starting pitchers, Eddie Cicotte and Lefty Williams, prove much harder to persuade. Without this pair of aces, there's no way the White Sox could intentionally lose the Series to the inferior Reds of Cincinnati. Yet, after Comiskey famously withholds a well-deserved bonus for Cicotte, he, too, figures to finally get his share.

Second baseman Eddie "College Boy" Collins and catcher Ray Schalk are the incorruptible couple; they're not even invited to the secret team meetings. The only infielder left to convince, then, is third baseman Buck Weaver (played perfectly by John Cusack - earnest, naive, and tragic, in turns). But both he and coach Kid Gleason seem so genuinely flabbergasted at the very idea of playing anything but honest baseball (although Buck knows of the fix and Gleason should've known) that we soon learn Buck can't be corrupted either.

A pair of knucklehead outfielders, Happy Felsch and Shoeless Joe, are perceived as the "dumb and dumber" of the American League and are thus easily strongarmed into the charade. (That Felsch is played by the raucous Charlie Sheen now gives the film cultish potentiality). There's plenty of pathos here (Shoeless Joe can't read and is therefore powerless outside the diamond) and cheap laughs are had on their behalf, but there's some real poetry to their play.

Third-sacker Buck Weaver plays a similarly idyllic hot corner with real tenacity (apparently Cusack was coached by recent HOF inductee Ron Santo during the film) and trademark childlike smile, spending his on-screen time off the diamond playing stick ball in alleyways with the neighborhood kids. But of course he's also playing in a figurative hot corner, as Buck finds himself in on the secret, but unwilling to comply with the fix. He stomachs the deceit, plays hard, and impulsively berates his teammates for their deliberately bad play, as if the demands of the game to play properly right now transcend all other agreements, circumstances, or realities. Only zen masters, monkeys, and childlike ballplayers are capable of such dedication to immediate play.


 Buck Weaver, 1913


A pair of reporters - the proverbial Greek chorus (played by a wonderfully smarmy Studs Terkel and with corpse-like solemnity by director John Sayles) - are hot on their trail, noting the instances of fishy fuck-ups and bonehead blunders committed by what some believed, at the time, to be the greatest team they'd ever seen.

As we know by now, the Sox lost the Series in eight (!) games, then got exposed by these reporters, and were eventually indicted for conspiring to throw the Series.

However, most people forget that these immensely popular players were found not guilty by the Chicago jury. But it didn't matter to Kenesaw Mountain Landis - newly appointed commish and totalitarian dictator of baseball. He promptly banned all players for life, as we're often reminded of every time another scandal emerges in baseball or each time we come across Field of Dreams.

So it's home to their families, to their farms, to their ignominious ends. The newly dubbed Black Sox faded into the fabric of American legend. All except for Buck Weaver, who campaigned tirelessly to have his name cleared and his reputation restored so he could return to the game he never could let go of. He was denied and ignored, and he died at 65. At the end of the film, Buck is shown five years after his expulsion watching some bush-league game in Hoboken with a crowd of young men murmuring about the rightfielder, who looks an awful lot like Shoeless Joe. Of course it's him, but Buck assures them "all those players are gone."

The cynic would say Buck only set himself up to be the sap, keeping mum, and believing his teammates would turn the corner and play on the level - or, in the end, believing in some sense of fairness in the baseball hierarchy. But Buck Weaver is clearly a tragic character. It wasn't so much the corruptibility of his fellow teammates -- The Southside Seven -- but the contemptuousness of organized crime, and ultimately of organized baseball itself (embodied in tight-asses Comiskey and Landis) that set him up as the tragic hero of the film. The childlike way in which he played both an ebullient and stalwart Series on such an uneven playing field, combined with his desperate pleas for latter-day absolution, simply puts to rest any doubt of the tragic nature to Buck Weaver's life in baseball.

To be honest, I found Eight Men Out (the film) to be even more enjoyable than Eliot Asinov's detailed, engrossing, but poorly-paced 1963 book by the same name (8 Men Out). Hell, it's the best baseball film I've seen.

Yet.

Friday, December 9, 2011

Ups and Downs, Rox and Browns

With the Face of the Franchise now stolen away from both the Mets and Cardinals, the slick crooks of Little Havana and Disneyland are shamelessly vomiting out hundreds of millions of dollars for each their own southpaw starter. Not content to have raped Queens of her star, Miami ripped the soul out of the southside and stole away Mark Buehrle (he of the Perfect Game), while the crowds in L.A. coo at C.J. Wilson's decision to play for his hometown.

But what's new here in the BULLPEN?  Well, here's one headline:

CUBS AND ROCKIES SWAP FAILURES

The Rox finally disposed of another pasty white lug who couldn't man the hot-corner. But I haven't seen anything out of Colvin to make me think he's any better of a player than Stewart, except for that video on mlb of him legging out a triple (at least he looks faster than oafish Ian). The Cubs also get righthanded reliever Casey Weathers in the deal, who I barely remember even hearing about last season. But apparently the Rox brass is blaring loudest about acquiring this DJ LaMaheiu fella (sounds ridiculously Smooth Jazz Radiojockeyish), apparently another infielder to add to the merry-go-round.

With Herrera, Nelson, EY Jr, and LaMeheiu all undoubtedly inadequate in some ways or others, it's looking like the platoon-horny schmucks in charge don't mind prolonging mediocrity and destroying the careers of decent young infielders by turning them into schizophrenic failures, unable to grow some cajones and get beyond their collective performance anxiety. Shoot, the same probably goes for our third outfielder, too. Whomever he may be.


*                    *                    *


Out in the deep green grass of Coors roams the long-legged doe, Dexter Fowler, still green himself, but with the potential to be one of the best centerfielders in the sport. He's also expected to have a breakout season offensively. For real this time. But unless Jim Tracey gets him out of the leadoff spot and back to the 2-hole where he's most comfortable, there's gonna be some seriously disappointed fans in Denver.

Carlos "The Little Pony" Gonzalez can play anywhere and make it look easy. The dude loves to dive and slide and flash the leather, as much as he enjoys showing off that powerfully smooth swing. The Little Pony of the national league could make a run at MVP again, now that expectations have been tempered.

But the story of the third outfielder has been a woeful tale for the Rockies over the past several years. Watching Brad Hawpe shrivel from an All-Star rightfielder into an incompetent firstbaseman for the Padres, Rox fans have to wonder if we can really expect anything better from the Seth Smith, Ryan Spilborghs, and/or Tyler Colvin trio. Why not deal these players for pitching, and bring up Wheeler or Blackmon again?


*                    *                   *


Let's get the ball back into the infield. Although it'd be nice to snag Martin Prado, I think better value lurks with Placido Polanco. He was forgettably brilliant last May (.398, 10/5 BB/K, 19 RBI), and always wins a gold glove no matter where he plays (2B in 2009, 3B in 2010), plus he never strikes out. So add another veteran goldglover in the infield with Tulo and Helton -- likely the best defenders at their respective positions in all of baseball -- then simply start the best glove of the four platooners from above (at either 3B or 2B).  That sounds solid enough to challenge the '07 Rockies for the best team fielding percentage record in the history of the major leagues! (Lest we forget those glory days).

But what about the Rockies of today? Make no mistake, the Rox have been active this off-season. Active like somebody who insecurely keeps himself busy all the time in order to appear hard at work. They stupidly released a very valuable closer in Huston Street. And smartly cut Wigginton, just for the hell of it. They saved a tiny bit of money on the Iannetta/Hernandez flip. And for whatever reason, signed an undesirable, flyball-inducing innings-eater, Kevin Slowey. That still leaves a lot of money to get an Ace. And an Ace we need, oh-so-badly, ever since we traitorously traded Ubaldo.

Well, CJ Wilson went to Disneyland with Whinnie the Pujols, so there's only one Ace left out there.
It's the highly coveted Yu Darvish.
This is it, Rox. Your last chance.
This guy's numbers are no fluke.

Check it out, it's the Stat of the Week


Alas, we all know the emptyheaded Monforts are cheap bastards and there's no way in hell the Rockies could ever muster enough sophistication and/or foresight to pull this one off. Not as long as these same twisted minds are still in control. Given their history of terrible pitching contracts and the discriminatory practices of their more recent past, would it surprise anyone if the Rockies were reticent to go after Japaense-Iranian Yu Darvishsefad as opposed to simply "trusting" in dudes like Alex White, Drew Pomeranz, and Christian Friedrich (suspiciously Jeff Franciscan in his underwhelmingness) -- who stunk it up in Double-A last year (6-10, 5.00 ERA, 1.49 WHIP)? One thing has become clear over the years. Despite a consistently full Coors field, the old white men at the top only care about augmenting their own wealth, like every other jerk in the 1% -- to use the parlance of our times.

Thus, dear friends, with all your typical major league b.s. continuing to give Baseball a bad name, it may be time once again (after this season, of course) to abandon the mlb, and, in the meantime, to get to know the local amateur team, the Denver Browns, in time for my spring visit back home.







Friday, December 2, 2011

Moneyball, Epstein, and the Cubs

Chicago

After a memorable October Classic – intriguing for the opposing managing styles of the two clubs, bizarre for the number of little league blunders committed by both sides, and exciting for its unlikely lead changes throughout – we’re finally past November and settling in for the arrival of The Hawk, as winter is known around these parts.

Baseball’s return to the North and South sides is quite a few page-flips ahead in the calendar, and city sport fans seem content pondering the improved fortunes of their beloved Bears (it’s the offensive line, if you ask me). And yet, perhaps for the unseasonable warmth and sunshine we've had, or maybe with the NBA away settling its absurd labor dispute, baseball doesn’t feel that far away. At least not for Cub fans.

The hiring of President Theo Epstein and, to a much lesser extent, manager Dale Sveum has created a stir, and local papers continue to provide a steady stream of news about the Northsiders, even if the tidbits are relegated to the final pages of the sports section.

Who the hell is Theo Epstein, and what does he have to offer the Cubs?

At first glance Epstein is just another upper-tier, baseball executive: white bread, Ivy League, highly paid, essentially bland and inoffensive to eye or ear. He does stand out for being relatively young – in fact, he became the youngest GM in MLB history in 2002 when the Red Sox hired him at the ripe age of 28. But why?

Epstein’s brand of baseball, as popularized in the book-come-movie Moneyball, seems to represent a paradigm shift in managerial thinking. In many ways, it's a story that illustrates the differences between theory and practice, with the former represented by sabermetrics pioneer Bill James, and the latter personified by the likes of Oakland A’s GM Billy Beane and Epstein. (Full disclosure: When it comes to mathematics, I have trouble grasping anything beyond long division, and I am thus incapable of comprehending, let alone explaining, the more technical aspects of James’ statistical… innoventions. I will, however, drop James’ name and ideas shamelessly throughout the present and future posts.)

We can imagine James the theoretician, on duty as a night watchman at a pork and beans factory in the late ‘70s, hunched over a desk, pouring over piles of box scores and baseball stats, dreaming up new ways to answer a very simple question: what is it that makes one team score more runs than another? (Hearing about night watchman James immediately conjures up Einstein in his younger years, which he spent working at a Swiss patent office while moonlighting with his theory of relativity). Unconvinced by traditional baseball stats, James looked to previously unquantifiable aspects of the game to come up with categories like runs created (runs a player helps create, as well as a team’s projected number of runs), range factor (defensive ability, quantified), and even something cool called a “Pythagorean Winning Percentage.” It goes without saying that fame and fortune did not come overnight to the statistician, but as players' salaries continued to climb to astronomical heights in the decades that followed, his quantitative approach to the game would soon be not only theoretically intriguing, but a financial necessity for front office staffs.

Perhaps James, much like your average fantasy league nerd, simply relished in assembling imaginary squads of speedy hitters with sky-high on-base percentages who would consistently outscore their opponents. Was it merely intellectual curiosity and a passion for the game which drove him to compile his lengthy Baseball Abstracts?

Whatever his original motivations may have been, the practical applications of sabermetrics would not materialize until the early 2000s, when Billy Beane’s small market A’s lost key players to wealthier clubs. Unable to compete with the salaries offered up by the East Coast oligarchs, Beane brought in a young Yale grad and sabermetrician to help rebuild his team by assembling a collection of overlooked veterans, rookies, and would-be wash-ups – who were willing to play for peanuts compared to, say, a newly pinstriped (and bloated) Jason Giambi.

In short: sabermetrics, when put into practice by baseball management, ceases to be a theoretical exercise in assessing players and projecting winners, and becomes yet another example of capitalism's streamlining, wage-repressing logic. Which is not to say that professional baseball players have anything in common with South Asian textile laborers. The fact that the Cubbies are about to dole out $20 million next season to the likes of Carlos Zambrano is enough to make anyone's stomach turn – especially mine.

Which brings us back to Chicago. It will indeed be interesting to see what Epstein has in store for Wrigleyville in 2012. As far as intangibles go, he's proven himself a winner for bad luck clubs by breaking the so-called Curse of the Bambino and bringing two World Series trophies to Beantown. To be sure, Boston classifies as a big market team and has the payroll to match, but Epstein's initial approach was indeed inspired by Beane's success in Oakland (Incidentally, Beane turned down the job in Boston in 2002 before it was offered to young Epstein).

Interestingly, though, a number of other clubs have since gone Moneyball, which means that, thanks to simple supply and demand, previously overlooked players with high on-base and slugging percentages are now worth more than they were a decade ago. As a result, Moneyball has expanded to take a number of defensive categories into account, and each team's front office has its own means of rating a player's defensive performance. As Peter Gammons reported while Epstein was still in Boston: "The Red Sox have their own service that charts games, including how hard balls are hit. 'It goes beyond zone ratings,' says. 'We try to measure players by what the average defensive player at that position would get to.'" (http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/gammons/story?id=1880247)

Exactly how Epstein tackles the Cub dilemma is anybody's guess at this point. Will he go young, fast and unpredictable? Proven, solid and dull? Flashy and overpaid? If anything, the hiring of a somewhat bland and docile Dale Sveum is a sure sign that things on the field will be run from the front office, and not the dugout. And even with the bloated contracts of Zambrano and an aged Alfonso Soriano, the Cubs have room on the roster and payroll to make some huge off-season acquisitions. If Epstein wanted control, he's got it - now it's just a matter of what he will do with it. I, for one, will be watching.


Thursday, November 24, 2011

Turkey Day Podcast Test Run

A sonic shout-out to anybody who is caught listening:
Happy Thanksgiving.
I'll be baking some Arab Spring Stuffing
And mixing up a pot of Chili-Occupied Smashed Potatoes
While waiting for a fellow reliever
To pitch something on this here blog.

Bullpen Podcast, test run
 
"Uncloudy Day" by John Fahey

Thursday, November 17, 2011

In a Race to Get Reyes



With all due respect to the author of the post "Colorado Dreamin'", you gotta be more than a mile high if you think there's any chance in hell the Rockies would get (or even pursue) Jose Reyes. Or that a high profile superstar, having played his entire mlb career in New York, would have the slightest interest in leaving the Big Apple to chill out in Denver during his prime years as a sizzling shortstop who'd be forced into playing second base for a mid-market team and for an almost exclusively white, middle-class, family-friendly fanbase in the Rocky Mountains.


No way!


Jose Reyes needs to play for their division rivals, the San Francisco Giants.


               The race is on!




The photo of Reyes below, probably taken during or after another Amazin' defeat at some point over the past few years, clearly shows him longing for the West Coast ... and the chance to play loose and free baseball once again, this time with the Misfits -- the 2010 World Champs -- playing for fun, and playing in front of those unmistakeably wacky fans, in the coolest city in the country.




Reyes would be a much better fit with the misfits

San Francisco's eclectic mix of deadheads, deadbeats, southpaws, transplants, and various Bay Area bizarros needs the electricity and exuberance of a player like Reyes. It would set that stadium on fire. The ground would tremble like it was 1989.

The triumphant return of Profesor Reyes and his bigscreen, between-inning, Spanish language lessons would only be the beginning. Beard-growing challenges, psychedelic play on and off the diamond, The Freak and a Kung-Fu Panda at his side.

Now that's a wonderfully strange brew I'd like to get drunk on for the next few years.

But let's get out of the sky and back to the diamond. Other than Omar Vizquel (from '05-'08), have the Giants ever had a cool and/or good shortstop since their move to San Francisco? Don't say Royce Clayton. Or the likeable Shawon Dunston, who never played more than 90 games in any of the three seasons he played by the bay. Simple fact is, the Giants historically need a cool shortstop as much as they immediately (and desperately) need one.

And the thought of bringing old teammates back together, Beltran and Reyes -- two great players plagued by unfortunate injuries -- warms the heart of any baseball fan who sympathizes with those who love(d) the Mets.

In Queens, Reyes was "the face of the franchise" as the fella says. The Mets would be crazy to let him go to this new Miami team. But if he wants to head West for the Golden Gates of Unlimited Devotion, then they'd really be doing something great for the country of baseball by thanking him for what a long, strange trip it's been, and wishing him well.

Sorry, New York, this race is a steal-your-face.





Tuesday, November 15, 2011

What a Week for Wilson Ramos

¡Accent on the O!
Los Nacionales beisból trackings




What a week for Wilson Ramos,
who was kidnapped
by Colombians
before gametime in
Aragua

Whisked away 
to the mountains of 
Carabobo.

An elderly couple
provided food and water
while he waited
and he must've wondered
"¿Qué es ésta weá?"

He'd been taken
at gunpoint
and they wanted some
dinero

Or perhaps
to capture a catcher
to hit cleanup on
La Selección
de béisbol
de Colombia

 Baseball
is the most popular sport
en Venezuela

A
15 minute
shootout
to rescue Wilson
in an airlift operation
tuvo éxito

Baseball
is the not most popular sport
en Colombia

Wilson Ramos
was naturally
relieved
It was a
final feliz

His friend
Miguel Cabrera
was the first to call
his sister
with the 
buena noticia

She did not believe him

Sure! 
Just call the 
Venezuelan
Ministro del
Poder Popular para
las Relaciones
Interiores
y
Justicia


And it was so

Eleven Colombians
have been arrested
of whom only 6
showed their
máscaras faciales

The papers didn't say
if they played
béisbol
nor
beisból


The papers did say
his abductors
were linked to
"grupos de secuestro"

But c'mon, Colombia

Gotta 
kidnap somebody better
than Wilson Ramos
no?

The very next day
Ramos finished a distant 
fourth
for
the
NL 
RoY

What a week for Wilson Ramos




Colorado Dreamin'


The Colorado Rockies need to be active this off- season. The Rox have David Wright in the crosshairs, which would be expensive but exciting. They're reportedly also interested in Martin Prado and Grady Sizemore. But consider this unlikelihood from an alternate reality: the Rox should sign Jose Reyes to a multi-year deal instead.

Why, you may ask, when they already have Tulo at SS? Well, besides the fact Reyes is about the coolest player in the game, and the Miami Marlins seem to be on the same wavelength (with Hanley Ramirez at SS), here are some less subjective reasons...

1) Because Reyes can play 2B. Thankfully, the Rockies let their old friend Jamie Carroll sign with Minnesota, and last year's pickup Mark Ellis signed with the Dodgers. The Rockies are now left with Eric Young Jr. - who for whatever reason isn't the guy they believe in.

2) Because Reyes is a switch-hitting lead-off man who won the NL batting title and steals lots of bases. The Rockies haven't had a good lead-off hitter since Eric Young, Sr back in the mid 90's. Imagine what Reyes could do at Coors! Triples, homers, doubles, oh my!

3) Because the Rockies need versatility in the infield. For whatever reason, Colorado infielders are consistently getting injured. EY and Herrera and Stewart and Tulo and Helton, all spend lots of time on the DL. And perhaps Tulo's 10 yr. contract and 6'4", 220lb frame suggests he may have to move to third base at some point down the road. Although make no mistake: he's currently the best defensive shortstop in the majors. Even if that's a ridiculous non-concern right now, think of how versatile the Rockies infield would be with Reyes able to play 2b, 3b, and more-than-adequately fill in for Tulo at SS. Unless of course Reyes himself gets injured. Again.

4) Because the Rockies will obviously never have good pitching. But emphasizing stellar defense, speed, and incredible hitting (a faster version of the Blake Street Bombers, with multiple batting title winners and perennial MVP candidates) might just be enough to win the NL West and return to the playoffs.

5) And most importantly, because their lineup would be the fastest, most exciting, and most fun to watch in all of baseball. Dexter Fowler could return to the two-hole where he's said several times he feels more comfortable. And if they're serious about giving Ian Stewart another shot, then drop him to 8th in the order and take a lot of the run-producing pressure off. The lineup looks amazing...


1. Reyes - 2b
2. Fowler - CF
3. Gonzalez - LF
4. Tulowitzki - SS
5. Smith - RF
6. Helton - 1b
7. Pacheco/Iannetta - C
8. Stewart - 3b
9. Pitcher

Otherwise, if the Rockies are completely unwilling to go all-out for Reyes, they're gonna have to sign both Prado and Sizemore -- as it looks like Seth Smith would be part of the Prado trade -- needing not only a solid starting outfielder to replace Smith, but also an above-average infielder like Prado (seeing as how there are gaping holes at both 2b and 3b).

In that case, the lineup could look like this...

1) Fowler - CF
2) Prado - 2b
3) Gonzalez - LF
4) Tulowitzki - SS
5) Sizemore - RF
6) Helton - 1b
7) Pacheco/Iannetta - C
8) Stewart - 3b
9) Pitcher

Hmmm...that ain't too shabby either.

In the third scenario, one that also looks pretty damn good, the Rockies get David Wright and allow EY Jr. (and perhaps Jonathan Herrera) to man the keystone position.


1) Young - 2b
2) Fowler - CF
3) Gonzalez - LF
4) Tulowitzki - SS
5) Wright - 3b
6) Helton - 1b
7) Pacheco/Iannetta - C
8) Smith - RF
9) Pitcher


Bottom line is that the Rockies gotta do something. Getting the affordable James Loney, whom the Dodgers don't give a shit about, would be a smart move. The dude loves hitting at Coors (.337/.385/.581) and has a good enough glove to replace the ancient (but capable) Todd Helton. But that'll never happen as long as Helton gets paid tens of millions of dollars yet again this season.

Here's one more lineup to ponder over...

1) Young - 2b
2) Sizemore -RF
3) Gonzalez - LF
4) Tulowitzki - SS
5) Prado - 3b
6) Helton - 1b
7) Iannetta/Pacheco - C
8) Fowler - CF
9) Pitcher

Pitching will forever remain anathema to Denver baseball fans. Signing Colorado-native Brad Lidge on the cheap might be a good idea, thus letting closer Huston Street walk. But starting pitching will be a huge problem for the Rox. JDLR won't be ready until May and none of our highly-touted prospects look ready to be in a major league rotation. We gotta go after Wandy Rodriguez, C.J. Wilson, and Edwin Jackson. Then we might just have a competitive rotation.

But I fear that the hot stove will soon burn all these half-baked ideas into a cloud of smelly smoke...and the Rockies will once again end up dishing out silly one-year deals to guys like Ty Wigginton and Jose Lopez.

May the winter meetings have mercy on us all.

Sunday, September 18, 2011

Nobody Owns This Game

It took only three days to watch the 24 hours of Baseball by Ken Burns. The first inning immediately gave me goosebumps, with beautiful waterfalls of words gushing from the likes of Whitman and Costas and Donald Hall, immediately illustrating the literary, reflective, and poetic qualities that always seem to gravitate toward this great game. But it was a slow and steady descent from there. Still enjoyable, and not without its moments of real brilliance -- particularly John Chancellor's easygoing narration through nine innings, and Keith David's tenor in the 10th -- the series gradually abandons its humor, playfulness, and eccentricity and instead falls into the same rhetoric of patriotic cliches and queasy nostalgia that is more becoming of Fox than PBS. Especially in the deplorable 10th inning which never shuts up about the goddamn Yankees and those pathetic Red Sox who finally break the Curse.


Most television documentary series simply follow the prefabricated narrative already entrenched in our collective memories, so why not do something more interesting and unexpected and enlightening? To be fair, the first and fifth innings did just that. Quirky personalities and idiosyncrasies are celebrated, humor plays a central role, and there's real poetry in the words and images. But the lingering images and stories are inevitably those of the latter innings, still fresh in the memory, and still stinking of sentimentality and sensationalist journalism. Hardly any players and no ordinary fans are interviewed. And in the 10th inning especially, we learn jack shit from the fatherly blatherings of some wealthy white BoSox columnist yacking on about Yawky Way providing an emotional bond between him and his pug-nosed son. Are we supposed to swallow this horse shit as if it means something to the rest of us?


Aw, I'm sounding like a sour old man. The series is definitely worth watching. But the series must go on, if only to redeem it from falling into a kind of hokey purity where the cursing and fun have vanished, replaced by stuffy old stiffs whose seriousness about scandals is just plain laughable, man. And enough with the goddamn national anthem already! Only the 8th inning, which starts with the infamous Hendrix recording from Woodstock, has any value after the first inning's predictable opening of blaring and honking horns playing the star spangled banner. Jimi's version shimmers as it always has; an epic departure from the status quo -- much like the social life and the style of baseball in the 60's and early 70's -- which were introspective and critical of stolid American institutions, and therefore insightful and provocative, paralleling the electrifying and truncated careers of players like Clemente and Koufax and Curt Flood. Disappointingly, these are the only three players discussed in any depth from this era, which otherwise is brushed over in favor of continual fawning over the dynasty teams.





It would've been more becoming of a PBS documentary to provide some insight into the smaller market teams, unsung players, and eccentric baseball cultures across America. Or to examine in depth one of the most amazing phenomenons in baseball history: Shadow Ball. The superficial treatment of such a complex practice didn't do it justice. In the tenth inning, nobody even comments on baseball finally coming to the great city of Denver and all the unique things about the Rockies playing mile high baseball, and how it has changed the game (statistical controversy, the humidor, etc.) Moreover, baseball isn't just "our game" as Burns and co. posit -- it is also the national sport in several other places around the world; the national teams of which usually kick the shit out of "our" boys. Cuba and S. Korea aren't even mentioned, and what little is said of Japanese or Caribbean hardball is of only passing interest to the director.


On that note, I just sent my dad a copy of "21" - the recently published graphic novel about Roberto Clemente, his favorite player. The text might not be great, but the illustrations provoke the imagination to wonder what he looked like playing with such exuberance in real life. And I'm finishing my copy of "A Zen Way of Baseball" by Sadaharu Oh tonight and will try to write a piece about it. Not familiar with the world's leading home run hitter of all-time? Not surprising; Burns and the gang fail to even mention his name once.

Thursday, June 30, 2011

Push it Fair

The mlb network recently revealed the top spot on their melodramatic list of the top 20 Greatest Games played in the last 50 years...

1975 World Series, Game 6 - Fenway Park
Big Red Machine vs. Boston Red Sox
Reds up 3 games to 2

Last year, after the Giants won a thrilling World Series, several of us experienced that immediate, gut-wrenching sensation of off-season withdraw and thus threw in an old videotape of this all-time classic.

Copenhagen, November 2010-

We can hear the ancient green ballpark groan at season’s end, worn and weathered under the dirtywhite nightlights beaming dimly on the weathered grass and infield dirt. The faded, grainy VHS image could be of any old baseball field on any one of those damp and frigid nights in late autumn. But it’s not. It’s Fenway in October. Those dizzy dimensions and that palpable anxiety are dead giveaways. We marvel drearily at the many nuances of mid- 70’s Americana: post-Nam exhaustion mingling with stubborn Irish hope; tweed jackets with elbow patches on flailing professor arms; clumsy on-screen text graphics generated by the world’s first computer; and most impressive of all, the personal style of the ballplayers…




Louis Tiant gesticulating with Satchel-like spasms and an array of flamboyant windups refuses to let the Big Red Machine find a groove in front of his Papi – "the Carl Hubbel of Cuba" beaming with joy under his dark brown fedora, shrouded in cigar smoke and untold tales of triumph. Pete Rose all coiled up in clenched stillness, waiting to strike from the left side; steps toward the ball, but holds up, his hands hang back on a slow curve…a hard twist of the hips and he rips a single to right-center. Fred Lynn: ROY, MVP, WS 3-run homer, and then busts his tailbone slamming into the centerfield wall. Joe Morgan’s back elbow flapping up and down in the batters box, his loose and sure fielding sure has style. And all the big hits by low profile players: Cesar Geronimo, a heroic name at a heroic moment, probably gave birth to a son named Sitting Bull Machiavelli, homers to put the Reds up 6-3. Then Bernie Carbo, looking overmatched at the dish, suddenly smacks a game-tying homer while drunk and stoned.
 

Cormac McCarthy could’ve said this old park hums with age and mystery. Yet from another angle, Fenway seems virgin – classic and pure – patiently waiting for a miracle to break that dreadful Curse. Foul ground and outfield walls not yet polluted by slogans and logos. Every blade of grass and craggy corner acquiescing to the grandeur of the green monster.

-Check it out, man…no fucking ads on the field or the backstop. It’s beautiful.
-There’s Sparky in the dugout, Wes…
-Mmm-hmm
-Toorn dees sheet auf, mahn. Beisbol boring!
-Shut the fuck up, Eduardo. And show some respect for Sparky; he just died.
-What da fuck is Sparky? Who cares?
-Here, take the doobie, CW
-Ooo….nice
-No goddamn ads or flags or flyovers…just baseball. It’s fucking beautiful.

Bottom of the 9th, runners at first and third with no outs, left-fielder George Frasier makes a concentrated catch right at the stands in shallow left and heaves it hard past the noses of nervous on-lookers leaning in to see if Doyle can tag and score. Shouldn't he have tried to slide instead of dive? Probably. The double play kills the inning and quiets the crowd. Everyone here is asleep, scattered on the floor, in the hammock, on the couch and I’m too tired to go into extras. Fisk will have to wait till tomorrow to hit it…


Late morning.

A couple dudes still sleeping on the floor, one in the hammock. The VCR clicks into motion and Joe Morgan strokes a fastball for an opposite field hit. Fast forward. Morgan again, snapping a throw on the run right into the first baseman’s glove with perfect nonchalance. Nothing too flashy, no big stats for this game, but making his presence strongly felt. A complete player with both bat and glove, he won the most prestigious individual awards and team championships before entering the Hall and working the mic on Sunday night baseball telecasts with Jon Miller. 


Fast forward to the top of the 11th. Ken Griffey Sr. on first. Morgan pulls one to deep right field, Evans sprinting toward the tiny wall, Griffey sprinting around the bases -- confident it'll go over the short fence or drop for extra bases -- and Evans makes a spectacular if awkward catch with fans hands all around him. He turns and immediately chucks the ball toward first base, off-line but in plenty of time with that strong arm to double-off Griffey.

“The best game I ever played in” – said by a guy who loved winning more than anybody. Pete Rose, a notorious competitor (who even gambled 10,000 bucks per game on his team finishing 162-0), yelled out after Carbo's homer, "This is fun!" Dude should be in the Hall.

And, of course, 12th inning…Fisk waves it fair.  The media thus found a way, serendipitously, to sensationalize the game, pre-fabricating narratives and placing cameras everywhere to plan for shots like Fisk hopping up the baseline. This time, though, it was accidental and for that very reason, magical. And the mytho-poetics of this great sport continue to express themselves in popular culture; in mediocre film (Good Will Hunting), high-brow literature (DeLillo’s Underworld), and on the internet (Dock Ellis & the LSD No-No). That majestic homer off the foul pole means the Red Sox live to see another day.




And finally she yawns – a silent roar – creaking under the weight of rowdy fans flooding onto Yawky Way with that stubborn hope still in the air, ‘cuz maybe some damn miracle might release us from this Curse -- tomorrow night in Beantown in the seventh and final game versus the Big Red Machine, with The Spaceman on the mound.

But the Game had become and continues to be “more Machine now than Man….twisted and evil,” reflected not so much in Vader-like villains of yesteryear, (the recently deceased Steinbrenner comes to mind), but the robotic, joyless, business-like metamorphosis of ballplayer into corporate cog. The blind consumer that is the Fan. More subtle then, strikingly obvious now. And as the Machine prevailed in the past, it does so today with an even greater autonomy free from human intervention. And the Spaceman loses.

The Machine is also dominating the way we humans perceive, interpret and appreciate baseball today. Rather than raging in anger at the removal of our favorite players from our favorite teams, we placidly accept the supremacy of a mechanical kind of logic positing greed as the strongest motivator in a multi-billion dollar industry crawling with blood-sucking agents and empty-headed athletes. Ticket prices continue to rise as our teams turn into souless corporations and continue to be disfigured beyond recognition. Fans are arrested at ballgames for not sitting through the Bush-era war chant of “God bless America”. The 7th inning stretch not only stretches our patience with all of the hokey patriotism and jingoist arrogance, but is in itself a stretch in its pathological attempt to link the game of baseball with military might and flag-waving herds of passive consumers. It stretches the thruth like so many other lies of the Bush era, refusing to acknowledge that beisbol is an international game with international citizens who happen to play in the US and Toronto and some of whom are deeply offended and saddened by such contrived nationalism (high-five, Carlos Delgado).




On yet another militant level, the violent mechanism of the Police and their intimidating presence – shooting taser guns at foolhardy fans for nothing more than running on the field – adds to the paranoia and dehumanization of our culture at large, and baseball in particular. In the past, it was we Fans who determined when we would run on the field together (see one of "Baseball's Best Moments": KC vs. NYY 1977, Chambers HR), in a triumph of joy over security.



And, again, the Machine now consumes a new discourse, dictating the way in which we value life, players, and how we value the Game – this time all according to strictly quantifiable sets of subjective criteria.

We can ask ourselves, without a trace of nostalgia, where are the Charlie Hustles of today? A guy who could coach and play (balls-out) simultaneously, all while using that passion and cockiness and wealth to gamble on his team to win every fucking game they played in.



Not even bothering to interview Rose along with teammates Morgan and Bench, the demeaning mlb network removes the wild card from the deck, playing it safe, tossing the same pre-written softballs to the dumb jocks and watching their woozy and bloated heads blather on about the same story they’ve told a thousand times in the same way. But these dumb jocks were great players and played hard and smart baseball to beat the Beantowners in that conveniently forgotten seventh and final game. The Big Red Machine were World Series champs.

Now, in 2010, Brian "The Machine" Wilson and that magical mess of misfits shut down the over-pumped Texas sluggers to win the World Series. Reluctantly embraced by the Machine proper, even the misfits had to be commodified. Fake coal-black beards, Kung-Fu Panda outfits, and even Torture Ball as a brand are all assimilated into the Machine as part of the corporate takeover of baseball culture. And we, the fans, are a bunch of suckers.

Welcome to the Machine.


Monday, June 20, 2011

BroadCasting

The cleanup man whips around and yells something at the pitcher, his furrowed brow and flexed neck muscles ready to explode. Hesitating, the ump decides not to issue a warning. The slugger finally makes his way down to first base. Two guys on, two runs in, only one out...


Listening to the ESPN Sunday Night Baseball goons regurgitate the nerd lingo dictated into their earpieces, I can’t help but feel a sad longing for the days of Joe Morgan. But remember, he was fired from the network. Probably for the best. Well, actually, not really. The best voice in the game, Jon Miller, was also canned. But still, there was something soothing about Morgan's voice and the fact that my grandpa always thought he was the world's greatest player - and by extension - announcer.

Vin Scully is now the last dinosaur of baseball broadcasting and it wouldn't surprise me if Dodgers brass hovers around the old man after every game, asking him about his health while offering him some deep fried garbage. Baseball television broadcasts are in a disturbingly clone-like era where Fox seems to have replicated the Buck/McCarver two-headed monster in each city. At least Morgan and Miller were silly and different. Will Fox dare to give Scully the hook at some point if he shows a similar unwillingness or inability to become a corporate stooge? Morgan was not willing or able. In fact, I'd like to think the conversation between Morgan and ESPN went something like this:

ESPN: Mr. Morgan, we’d like for you to repeat the statistical information given to you in your earpiece, word-for-word.


Joe Morgan: What the fuck are you talking about?


ESPN: Listen, Joe… The game is changing; how we look at the game is changing. There are a lot of hard-working people coming up with new and better statistical categories for evaluating productivity. And you need to cooperate here. We’ll have our statisticians tell you what to say and all you have to do is repeat it; just throw it out there for the audience to latch onto.


JM: I don’t need to be told what to say, like some goddamn puppet. I’ve been around this game my whole life. Don’t you think I know how to evaluate a player based on my intimite knowledge and experience of the game? I can sense when a player is pressing; you can feel it in your belly when the runner on first is gonna steal; my instincts tell me more about how a pitcher should approach a batter in a given scenario, far more than new-age stats will ever do.


ESPN: We’re not asking you to do this Joe; we’re telling you this is part of your new job responsibilities as a color commentator. You’d be wise to read up on the new stats and get familiar with the terminology.


JM: I’m not gonna sit around repeating a bunch of numbers babbled in my earpiece all game, throwing me off and preventing me from sittin’ back and observing all the little things between the lines. I know what I’m talking about here.


ESPN: Joe, this is the direction in which the network is already going full-speed ahead on, and you’re just holding us back at this point. Perhaps it’s best if you reconsider your position with us.


JM: I’ve been doing Baseball Tonight for over 20 years, helping to make it the most popular weekly baseball event on tv, and this is how you show your appreciation and loyalty?


ESPN: We’re giving you a chance to keep your job by adapting to our new vision on how to announce baseball games based on Sabermetric research.


JM: No. You’re telling me how I should perceive the game and forcing me to communicate my observations in quantifiable statistical categories instead of letting me continue to describe the qualitative aspects of movement, process, situation, and sensibility.


ESPN: For the last time, Joe, we’re not asking you to get on board with us. We’re telling you where the ship is sailing and expecting you to do your part or find another job.


JM: Then sail your fucking ship as far away from me as fast as you can. I’m done.






...alas, the conversation was probably nothing like this at all.


Listening to Bobby Valentine talk about the great left-field play of diminuitive Brett Gardener last night, he stumbles over some strange sentences whispered into his earpiece,

“Gardener is second in the league to…Parra…uhh…among left-fielders …with…uh…thirteen…runs…uh…prevented. Yes, thirteen runs saved.”

Obediantly repeating the words like a good corporate stooge, but sounding like a tool in doing so. “He’ll learn,” the ESPN producers cry, “at least it’s better than Morgan not broadcasting anything we tell him to say.”

Orel Hershiser talks exclusively about pitchers and their challenges and accomplishments. He’s not been heard from for an inning or two, as he’s probably been told to recite and record a prepared interlude constructed between innings on pitch sequences to specific batters and how to approach a hitter the second and third time around. Suddenly, we hear his voice, after a prolonged absence, chime in with haste and overconfidence to tell us about how and why Sabathia attacks Soriano, pitch-by-pitch.

Don't get me wrong; the dutiful dictation done by these three elderly, wealthy, white men in stiff suits, starched shirts and in their square booth is more informative and analytical than an old Jon Miller/Joe Morgan broadcast, without a doubt. But in their attempts to analyze and criticize every nuance of the game and to quantify as many variables as technologically possible, they fail to let the game reveal anything surprising or unexpected to them or to us; they don’t allow themselves enough time to enjoy the game being played right in front of them. And we sure as shit don't feel like part of a conversation.

The aesthetics of the game are wiped away; style no longer has any substance. Personality is only interesting in so far as it can be absorbed into the Monoform. Nick Swisher with a shit-eating grin on his face sure looks good in those Norelco shaver commercials, eh guys? And he’ll make a great tv personality one day, so watch out – he might be here in the booth sooner than you think!

Grooming and manipulating and engineering forces, like the Emperor, to succomb to the dark side (negative, reactionary forces). Or striving to constrain or destroy positive forces (affirmative, active forces) by breaking them up – like the Jon Miller/Joe Morgan tandum – out of a deep-seated resentment toward human interference; nothing more than rusty cogs in the corporate machinery.

So baseball fans are relieved of an old stick-in-the-mud announcer, too damn stubborn to bend toward this new nerdball movement. Yet, we're left with a trio of petty, stiff and sanctimonious dweebs doing what they’re told, keeping an air-tight broadcast free of any unanticipated variables that might fuck with their pre-fabricated storylines; constraining and controlling the interpretation of the game to a single monolithic narrative, replete with a televisual grammar and logic that works the audience over, pounding us in the gut again and again with the same silly sequence of shots – strike three, zoom-in on pitcher who struts around the mound in confidence, cut to batter walking back to dugout with head down, then looking toward the field as if staring at the pitcher (“I’ll get you next time”), but is actually just passively watching the replay on the jumbotron; cut to establishing shot of stadium for an enthusiastic endorsement of some corporate product; cut back to centerfield camera for the next at-bat; repeat.


Why don’t we ever get to see how the infielders throw the ball around-the-horn after a strikeout? How they might be getting into the game, and if they look tense or playful when doing so. We need to hear the silence of between-inning breaks; the hum of the stadium organ, the murmur of the crowd as they do “the wave”, the indecipherable words of the p.a. announcer low and soft in the background; and the sight of the grounds crew working the infield over, players running out to their outfield positions to toss lazy fly balls to each other, the pitcher’s warm-up throws, the batter studying the pitches from the on-deck circle, “coming down!”…

And I continue to wonder why me and my buddies can’t have a crack at announcing games. Spontaneous, but well-informed. Teaching about the new statistical categories as one of many ways to appreciate the game. Full of humor and wit and exuberance. Aware of mistakes made, but highlighting the achievements and positive contributions done on the field. And with a lot more audience-involvement.

For starters, challenging baseball fans to discuss forming a Fans Union together so we can, among other things, claim the right to overthrow bad television and radio announcers that make listening to our hometeam a painful obligation instead of the stirring and thought-provoking experience it can potentially become.



The catcher has been out to talk with our hurler. He says little. Each man knows what is needed. First pitch fastball on the outside corner for strike one. Second pitch fastball away. Third pitch fastball inside, fouled off. Fourth pitch slider low and away. 2-2 pitch, changeup, low...

It's a grounder to short...6...4...3...double play. Mercifully ends the inning.

Sunday, April 10, 2011

Sam Fuld's Catch

Now the clean-up man steps up. Our pitcher is sweating profusely. Licking his chops, with a man in scoring position, the slugger has him right where he wants him. The southpaw in the stretch, checks the runner at second, stares in at the hefty hitter on the right side...

We don't have SportsCenter out here in Copenhagen, so we haven't been smothered with images of great moments like this in an endless repetition without reflection, emptying the moment of its beauty and meaning.

With Manny gone, Damon looks to do the DH'ing as the Rays now turn to a defensively-strong outfield, relying on one particularly scrappy and unproven player:

Sam Fuld - RF
Tampa Bay Rays

Last night, the bases loaded with ChiSox and Juan "in a million" Pierre at the plate, something utterly amazing happened in the outfield. Smallish Sam Fuld was playing Pierre shallow in right. Pierre skillfully pulled the ball toward the deepest corner of right field. At Fuld speed, this dude sprints after the soaring drive with the dedication of a pit bull after a frisbee. In Fuld stride, he literally FLIES -- recklessly and freely -- headfirst onto the gravel warning track, glove and body Fuldy extended to retrieve the sure-thing triple... It lands perfectly in the pocket of his outstretched mitt, as he's gliding in midair. Sam lands and slides awesomely through the warning track, turning onto his side right up to the base of the wall - and stopping millimeters from it, like an expert stuntman.

Even the fat and rowdy beer guzzling Southside boys behind the fence couldn't help but show their aggressive admiration, as the diminutive Sam Fuld jogged joyfully back to the dugout, briefly checking his left elbow for marks, beaming with childlike pride. It was beautiful.







p.s. 4/12/11


After "the flight" he took to prevent an inside-the-park grand slam, Sam Fuld promptly robbed Dustin Pedroia of a double last night at Fenway with a great diving grab.

But that's not all.

He fucking roped a homer off Dice-K right around the Pesky pole - like a gritty old player of the deadball era. Then in his next at-bat blooped a pitch to left-center field and stretched it into a double with a hard head-first slide easily beating the tag. He then showed-up his defensive counterpart Ellsbury in the outfield by driving one deep over his head - but not out of reach - "giving him the chance to make a great play", as Jacob of the Bare-Knuckle Boxers put it.

As a grand finale, needing only a single for the cycle, he slices a line-drive to left that's hit too hard for Crawford to cut-off and excitedly, instinctually rounds the bag and glides into second for his second double and no cycle.

Who is this guy?


...the sign is for a fastball high and tight. The hurler nods in approval, comes set. And the pitch...the two-seamer sails on him...heading for the slugger's head...he jumps while turning away...and it beans him in the back.

Saturday, April 9, 2011

Moons Over My Manny



Dreaded slugger of epic might
Joyful jester who kept it light
Did some drugs
Jacked some dingers
Peed on rugs
The smile that lingers



...he swings!
He rips the fucking cover off the ball
It bajooms of the left-centerfield wall.
RBI Double

Monday, February 28, 2011

Razing Arizona & a Rocky Road for the future

With one out, a guy on third and the no.3 hitter up, the team up to bat must score. It's imperative; but far too often that runner doesn't score. Presumaby the team's best hitter, the no.3 guy will drive in that run with either 1) a hit, 2) a sac-fly, 3) a grounder to the right side of the infield, or 4) a squeeze bunt. The fourth option is literally NEVER attempted, although its probability for success may be greater than all of the other options, especially when ahead in the count. The typically bloated egos of both manager and hitter are no doubt partly responsible for their unwillingness or inability to pull of the squeeze play -- it's not a play that exhibits masculine prowess -- but there's another weakness on their part that seems even more disappointing. The fear of danger and deviance.

A failed squeeze play is just as exciting as one that succeeds. But the chances of a squeeze succeeding in the right situation are no more risky or prone to fail than any of the other scenarios outlined above. But for some reason, sports fans are quicker to chastise strategic guile and daredevilry and abnormality than we are to condemn conservative decision making when it fails.



When applying for that mlb "dream" job, they demand you send in a video clip answering some questions, which I'm unable and too lazy to provide. The job's fine print reads like a probation sentence; but watching and commenting on all that baseball could be crazy and fun, especially if they pay up big. One question on the app asks: "What will be the biggest MLB storyline of 2011"? To which I proclaimed 2011 to be the year we initiate a Fans Union. Shit, the timing couldn't be better!

Watched the Rox archived spring training opener yesterday in its entirety, and there were several interesting things to note...

1. This Salt River facility at Talking Stick is perhaps the most vainglorious land seizure of Indian territory for white man's recreation in recent American history. A casino, shopping village and golf course surround the excessively large baseball wonderland, providing several more reasons we should all burn that feckin' state to the ground.

2. The taboo of building white man's bullshit on Indian burial ground -- like cutting down a magical fairy tree in Ireland -- has long been an effective myth in preventing the objectification of the earth for capitalist ends. Those who fail to heed these mystical warnings are punished by having two of our star players collide in foul territory on the first batter in the first inning of the first spring training game ever on this field. Let that play not be forgotten, as it no doubt portends future disasters of cosmological proportions.

3. After grounding into a d.p. and moving sluggishly behind the dish for a couple innings, Chris Iannetta further demonstrated he's not our best catching option. Add to this an amazing at-bat by Jordan Pacheco, some great footwork and pick-off attempts from McKenry, and the promising past of Mauer back-up, Morales, the Rox have plenty of better options to go to this year, which could make our catcher not a weakness but an asset.

4. Dexter Fowler looked good from both sides of the plate and hit the ball hard both times. Top 3 defensive centerfielder in the game could be in for a solid season at the plate, which would be HUGE.

5. Johnny Herrera continues to show he's got the best batting eye on the team, good speed, and a solid glove at 3B. Goodbye Strikeout Stewart, you and Iannetta need to be traded for a young firstbaseman.

6. Good to see the vets put a HURT on the ball in each at-bat: Wiggy, Lopez and Jacobs all looked mean and confident up there.

With that said, here's my immodest proposal to J.T. for 2011 --



Suggested Rox opening day lineup:

1. Herrera - 3b
2. Fowler - CF
3. CarGo - LF
4. Tulo - SS
5. Lopez - 2b
6. Helton - 1b
7. Pacheco - C
8. S. Smith - RF
9. Jimenez - P



The third base coach is flashing signs to the no.3 hitter who, out of habit, looks back with feigned seriousness as if there's even a remote chance the squeeze is on. Nobody in the stadium expects it. The aging hot cornerman is standing well behind the bag. The man on third gets a very healthy lead down the line...the pitcher decides to work from the windup...staring straight ahead, focusing on the batter as he's been told so many times.

The runner anticipates the exact moment when the pitcher will initiate a series of subtle and coordinated moves -- looking down at the very instant his glove starts to rise upward while his weight rocks backward ever so slightly -- and he's off! In a sprint down the baseline against a 90mph fastball, with only the pitcher's windup giving him a small headstart. Is it a straight steal of home!? Can't be! Impossible! And the pitch comes in at 85mph right down the middle...our no.3 hitter in his head knows how to square up to bunt, but his body refuses.

This watermelon looks so juicy, just floating in there all big and round and right down the pipe! Give it a hack and hit it out of the park; it's worth two runs instead of only one. Simple fucking math! Adios, pelota....

And then....